Language
Fact-checked

At LanguageHumanities, we're committed to delivering accurate, trustworthy information. Our expert-authored content is rigorously fact-checked and sourced from credible authorities. Discover how we uphold the highest standards in providing you with reliable knowledge.

Learn more...

What Does "Cutting off the Nose to Spite the Face" Mean?

G. Wiesen
G. Wiesen

The phrase “cutting off the nose to spite the face” means that a person is behaving in a way that may be immediately rewarding but is ultimately destructive or has negative consequences. This phrase is typically used to caution someone against acting in a hasty manner or to keep him or her from doing something that may have long-term or unforeseen costs. It is similar to a number of other phrases that have been used in different languages and periods of history. Its origin is somewhat difficult to ascertain, though there are at least two different stories.

One of the most common uses of the phrase is as a warning, usually directed toward someone in the form of “Doing that would be like cutting off your nose to spite your face.” Though the wording of the phrase may be somewhat stiff, the meaning can be determined simply by looking at the phrase itself. A person who cuts off his nose not only takes vengeance against his face, he causes his body as a whole pain and suffering in the process.

Woman standing behind a stack of books
Woman standing behind a stack of books

This literal examination of the phrase reveals its meaning quite simply. The phrase describes an action that may lead to initial or short-term satisfaction, but which has long-term or inevitable consequences that should be considered. An example could include someone who is angry at his or her spouse and decides to burn down their house as a way of destroying that other person's possessions. Since the house belongs to both of them, the person would also be doing harm to his or her own possessions as well.

The origins of the phrase “cutting off the nose to spite the face” are somewhat uncertain and two different stories explain its genesis. One story, which seems fairly apocryphal, claims that a group of nuns, led by Saint Ebba, were in danger of attack by rampaging Vikings in the 9th century. To preserve their chastity, legend holds that Saint Ebba cut off her nose to become unappealing to the men, and instructed the other nuns at the monastery to do so as well. This story indicates that the self-mutilation was successful and that the Vikings did not violate the nuns, but that the invaders burned down the monastery as an expression of their disgust.

A somewhat more likely source for the phrase holds that it is of Latin origin, and made its way into French usage in the 12th century. It may have been said in the 17th century to King Henry IV, who was going to destroy Paris as a way to punish the Parisians who disapproved of his rule at the time. In response to this, it is said that one of the king’s courtiers told him that doing so would be like “cutting off the nose to spite the face,” and the king assented.

Discussion Comments

RocketLanch8

Unfortunately, I learned first hand about the expression "cutting off your nose to spite your face". When I was in my 20s, I started working for a local restaurant as a cook, and the boss asked me to consider going into management. I had other plans for my life, and they didn't include working 14 hour days in a hot kitchen for relatively low pay. I decided to turn down the opportunity, despite my wife telling me I was cutting off my nose to spite my face.

I found other places to work, but none of them were especially satisfying. Several years later, that restaurant became a popular regional franchise. The man who took the job I was offered became the regional supervisor, with a nice salary and corner office. I turned down that job for selfish reasons, and it came back to bite me.

Phaedrus

The expression "cutting off your nose to spite your face" seems very similar to "throwing out the baby with the bath water" to me. I can see why someone might be tempted to make a short term decision that would have negative long term effects.

I have seen employers fire really talented but difficult employees without thinking about how to find replacements. Getting rid of that person may have felt like the right thing to do at the time, but he or she may have been working on a lucrative deal or project that would have made millions for the company later. Solving one small problem only created a dozen larger problems.

Post your comments
Login:
Forgot password?
Register:
    • Woman standing behind a stack of books
      Woman standing behind a stack of books