We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are the Origins of the Phrase "a Sight for Sore Eyes"?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The idiom “a sight for sore eyes,” meaning a welcome and pleasant event, appears to date back to at least the 1700s, although it may have been used earlier. As is often the case with well known idioms, the phrase has been borrowed by industry, as a casual survey of optometry offices will reveal. Many people continue to say that something is a sight for sore eyes colloquially, although they may be unaware of the roots of the phrase.

”Sore,” in this particular case, refers to being tense, fearful, worried, or sorrowful. While this meaning of the word in English is no longer widespread, during the time of the King James Bible, it was a commonly accepted usage. Since the King James Bible was one of the earliest official translations of the Bible into English, it can be assumed that many of the word usages in the Bible reflected common usage, since the intent was to make the Bible accessible for all. During this period, many people wrote and spoke of things like being “sore afraid,” for “extremely afraid.”

In this sense of “sore,” a sight for sore eyes would be something which brings about relief from tension or fear. Jonathan Swift appears to have been the first person to use the term in print, in 1738, writing that “the sight of you is good for sore eyes.” His casual usage of the term suggests that it was probably a well known phrase in the England of the period, so it may have been in use for decades previously.

Over the years, Swift's words have been shortened, with most speakers redacting the “good for,” and turning the idiom into "a sight for sore eyes," with the meaning remaining the same. There are a few exceptions; some people use the term in the negative, suggesting that the sight in question actually brings about sore eyes. However, this reversal of the conventional meaning of this phrase is relatively rare, and usually clear from context. Should you find yourself arguing about the phrase with someone who holds the belief that it has a negative meaning, you may want to point out that the good usage pre-dates the bad.

Optometrists who have co-opted the term may not be aware that the eyes in question are sore in the sense of fearful, rather than sore in the sense of painful. Likewise with people who have come up with clever puns involving homonyms for “sight,” such as “site” and “cite.”

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a Language & Humanities researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments
By afterall — On Feb 24, 2011

I have never heard someone say "you're a sight for sore eyes" in a negative context. I suppose it might happen, but I've only ever heard it positively/nostalgically.

By stolaf23 — On Feb 23, 2011

While I think that these uses are correct, it is also generally believed that something is a sight for sore eyes if you haven't seen it in awhile. For example, if a close friend goes away for several months, when he or she returns, seeing that person would be a sight for your "sore" eyes, which are sore from hoping to see them.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.