We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What does "Read the Riot Act" Mean?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The idiom “to read the riot act” is used to describe a firm oral reprimand given to someone or a group. For example, one might say “after she read the riot act to the boys for clowning around, they settled down.” Rowdy behavior, rambunctiousness, or rudeness could all be viewed as causes for someone to be reprimanded, sometimes in front of other people to enforce the idea that the warning is indeed serious.

This slang term has its origins in the Riot Act of 1714, a law passed in Britain for the purpose of suppressing civil unrest. During this period in Britain, mobs would regularly gather to protest the government and incite anti-government behaviors. While some mobs started out relatively calmly, with people making speeches and talking among themselves, they sometimes grew out of control. The government also wanted to suppress the appearance of such mobs with the goal of solidifying the position of the king, fearing that the monarchy would be undermined by these gatherings.

In response, Parliament passed the Riot Act. Under the Riot Act, any group of 12 or more people could be deemed a “mob,” and if a magistrate literally read the Riot Act to the mob, they were legally obligated to disperse. Failure to disperse after an hour could be grounds for imprisonment, hard labor, or fines. As one might imagine, the penalties for violating the Riot Act were an incentive for groups to meet in secret so that they would not be caught, and to disperse quickly to avoid penalties.

Well through the 1800s, magistrates used the Riot Act to control unruly groups. By the 1840s, the Riot Act was falling out of favor, although it was not officially repealed until 1973. Along the way, it inspired the slang term, thereby becoming enshrined in the English language, although many modern English speakers are unaware of its history.

The first uses of the phrase in an idiomatic sense date to the early 1800s, right around the time when use of the Riot Act as a tool of discipline declined. Many Britons were familiar with the Riot Act, so it is perhaps not surprising that it came to be used in a joking idiom. Today, when someone is read the riot act, the goal is usually to reprimand him or her for negative behavior, encouraging an apology and a promise not to repeat the behavior.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a Language & Humanities researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments
By anon981913 — On Dec 15, 2014

I was at a student demonstration one time where the police captain actually read us the Riot Act, or at least words to that effect. Because we failed to leave the parking lot in an "expeditious manner", we were all considered in violation of city laws against loitering for malicious purposes. The next step would have been tear gas if we didn't leave in the next ten minutes. Most of us did leave voluntarily, but a few people stayed around to test the police. They got put in handcuffs and booked into the city jail for about 12 hours.

By Rico — On Nov 18, 2010

From the historic background, it can be argued that the riot act was essentially a tool used to oppress. Mobs seldom gather unless there's something they unhappy about and if such issues are addressed with sincerity there will hardly be cases of civil unrest, let alone the need to use legal means to quell them.

By Denha — On Nov 08, 2010

it always amuses me to know where the many idioms in our language come from. Knowing "read the riot act" originates in an actual Riot Act makes the entire saying make much more sense now.

By elizabeth23 — On Nov 08, 2010

Even without the historical context, I have always had the idea that when someone tells a story that begins or ends with änd then they read me the riot act", someone involved was doing something out of line. However, sometimes the "reader" is more at fault than the "rioter", as is always the case with reprimands.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.