We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Double Negative?

Mary Elizabeth
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A double negative is the use of two negatives in a single clause. Although this construction is used in informal language to intensify a negative meaning, in formal language it is usually considered unacceptable. This is because the words have the effect of canceling each other out, leaving a positive meaning, rather than intensifying a negative. The best approach to this construction, as with other language issues, is for the speaker or writer to consider the context as he decides how to most effectively communicate what he wishes to say.

The force of a double negative construction includes obviously negative words like


but also


with a negative slant, like


Common double negative situations and possible ways to convey them in more formal situations are listed below. Writers should notice that, in each case, one of the negative words has been replaced with a word having a positive meaning, so the net negatives in the sentence are reduced. The word any often appears in the formal versions. The same sentiment is being expressed in each case, although the language is different.

  • I don’t need none. → I don’t need any.
  • I don’t want to go nowhere. → I don’t want to go anywhere.
  • I can’t get no satisfaction. → I can’t get any satisfaction.
  • I’m not gonna do no homework today. → I’m not going to do any homework today.
  • I barely got no sleep last night. → I barely got any sleep last night.
  • It was so hot, I couldn’t hardly breathe. → It was so hot, I could hardly breathe.

There are also occasions in which triple negatives are used to evoke an even greater sense of negation:

  • I ain’t never gonna do no homework.
  • I ain’t gonna take nothing from nobody.
  • You ain’t never gonna go nowhere with me if you act like that.

In formal situations, these would also be reduced to the use of a single negative:

  • I’m not ever going to do any homework.
  • I’m not going to take anything from anybody.
  • You aren’t ever going to go anywhere with me if you act like that.

With words that have negative prefixes, like


the meaning is construed differently: adding a negative before a word with one of these prefixes is understood to neutralize the negative and create a positive. These particular examples, separate from those above, are considered to be a literary




. In litotes, a person uses a double negative to understate an affirmative. Here are some examples:

  • That person is not unfamiliar to me. → That person is familiar to me.
  • This essay is clearly not nonsense. → This essay is clearly sensible.
  • I receive a not insufficient allowance. → I receive a sufficient allowance.
Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary Elizabeth
By Mary Elizabeth
Passionate about reading, writing, and research, Mary Elizabeth is dedicated to correcting misinformation on the Internet. In addition to writing articles on art, literature, and music for Language & Humanities, Mary works as a teacher, composer, and author who has written books, study guides, and teaching materials. Mary has also created music composition content for Sibelius Software. She earned her B.A. from University of Chicago's writing program and an M.A. from the University of Vermont.
Discussion Comments
By anon332813 — On May 01, 2013

A double negative should never be used.

By anon323546 — On Mar 05, 2013

I couldn't care less seems to be a double negative because of "less" and "not" If you could not care less, I guess you care a lot. Why is "I couldn't care less" acceptable and "I could care less" disapproved? If I could care less, that means I don't care as much as I did before, or as much as anyone else does. I couldn't care less equals I could care much.

By anon273931 — On Jun 09, 2012

What is the proper response if the question is: "How are you"? Since the word "you" is a noun, is "I'm good" a correct response? Or, is it still "I'm well"?

By anon252078 — On Mar 04, 2012

@intel47: I don't understand why you get angry over someone saying "I could care less" rather than, "I couldn't care less." Is that not simply implying that they could, in fact, care less about the situation?

Languages evolve. We need to stop crying over things such as double negatives used in the right context, and more about teaching people the basics of spelling and punctuation.

If a double negative is used to state a positive in a negative light, I believe it was used correctly.

"I ain't going nowhere."

If, however, the double negative is used to imply a negative, then there is a problem.

"I never did nothing wrong."

By anon182629 — On Jun 02, 2011

Are you kidding? Double negatives are completely acceptable in colloquial English (particularly in specific dialects), because in informal language the grammar is described, not prescribed, meaning the rules fluctuate based on common usage. Do yourselves a favor and take a linguistics class.

By anon180446 — On May 26, 2011

@anon129488: I think you meant, "I cannot kill it with one shot."

Using "can't" and "not" at the same time would make the sentence a double negative, but your grammar is incorrect.

By anon150071 — On Feb 06, 2011

Is this an example?

I don't get why they can't label the dryers that don't work.

Is this example a situation where a double negative is allowed?

It's late so forgive me if this sounds stupid.

By anon137264 — On Dec 27, 2010

To use a double negative is pure laziness. Learn your language and speak it properly. There are no shortcuts.

By anon129488 — On Nov 23, 2010

Just a quick question. Wouldn't the sentence: "I can't not kill it with one shot." be a double negative?

By anon91529 — On Jun 22, 2010

I agree, nobody should use double negatives.

By anon80042 — On Apr 26, 2010

I cannot stand it when I see double negatives on tests! you would think a professional association would know better!

By anon79982 — On Apr 25, 2010

Oh my God, double negatives are never acceptable in English! How can you possibly say otherwise?

Anyone reading this website -- please realize it is not acceptable to use double negatives in informal or formal language!

By anon69499 — On Mar 08, 2010

I am stunned to find that someone has actually posted that double negatives are OK in informal speech. Never! Even St. Cloud State posted that it was OK. Don't leave the farm then. It is not acceptable. Period.

Good is an adjective and well is an adverb. An adjective modifies a noun, an adverb modifies an verb. 'Doing' is a verb, so the answer to "How are you doing" can only be answered with 'well': "I am doing well, thank you." not 'doing good'-- an adjective cannot modify a verb.

By intel47 — On Apr 29, 2007

I have heard the phrase, "I could care less" rather than, "I couldn't care less." I find I almost cringe when I hear less-than acceptable grammar and...when a person isn't articulate.

I've noticed even on television, "went (or gone) missing" rather than disappeared when a person is involved. You did really good rather than well. University education t.v. anchor/reporters, tend to be sloppy when it comes to using adverbs. I'd have thought by the time "talking heads" were on television, correct grammar and articulation, would be part of what they talk about...apparently not.

I had a typing teacher in high school, who attempted to teach us verbs and adverbs but somehow, along the way, the grammar gets forgotten.

Mary Elizabeth
Mary Elizabeth
Passionate about reading, writing, and research, Mary Elizabeth is dedicated to correcting misinformation on the...
Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.