We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Common Knowledge?

By Mark Wollacott
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Common knowledge is supposed to be the information that is known or is expected to be known by everyone. This can be information widely expected to be known across all of humanity or it can be based on culture, religion, location and group. The idea is important to social life because it can determine a feeling of inclusion or exclusion and isolation or acceptance. It is also related to conventional wisdom.

Philosophers try to distinguish between knowledge and awareness of knowledge. This revolves around the question of whether information is mutually known. For example, Brad has 12 friends and he tells each friend separately that they will meet at a movie theater at 8 p.m. Each of the 12 people knows he or she is going to the movie theater at 8 with Brad, but none know who else knows this information. In this sense, the time and place are common knowledge, but not mutual knowledge.

Some people believe, especially with younger people, that there are certain things everyone should know. Often, such knowledge becomes conventional or received wisdom. This means that the knowledge is not always true. One of the hardest problems for governments and groups is tackling myths, rumors and urban legends.

Sociology plays a part, because knowing or not knowing such information can determine if someone is in a group or excluded from it. Common knowledge can, therefore, be used as a tool for insulting or excluding someone else. Using the Brad example from above, Brad could use the separation method to tell 12 people about the movie trip, but not tell someone else. As the common knowledge is not mutually known, no one will pass the information on to the excluded individual.

Philosopher David Hume was the first to discuss the idea of common knowledge in 1740. David Lewis, however, was the first to introduce the term itself, in 1969. Lewis divided the idea into two distinct types: actual belief and reason to believe. Actual belief is based on actual firsthand experience of something. Reason to believe is based on reading, being told about something or having faith in some kind of knowledge.

In academia, students must cite proof of information stated in an essay or exam answer. This, however, excludes what is deemed to be common knowledge. The names of nations or presidents of America do not need to be cited. More specific dates, quotes and ideas need to be proved.

Common knowledge is used as the basis for a number of quizzes and quiz shows. Information deemed known to most people forms the bulk of easy and medium-level questions in TV shows such as “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire” and “The Weakest Link.” Specialized and uncommon knowledge is used for more difficult questions with higher prizes.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Ruggercat68 — On Nov 19, 2014

I once took an online test to see if I would qualify as a contestant for a well-known game show, and I'd say the test was 95% common knowledge questions. People probably know more than they think they do about history and geography and other subjects, and the test creators didn't really try to get more challenging than any other general or common knowledge test I've taken in the past.

I think that every generation has a different definition of common knowledge, however. My generation grew up watching certain TV shows and listening to certain musicians and watching certain movies. To me, common knowledge trivia questions would center around that core group of facts and figures. To my youngest son, however, that same set of common knowledge would not be as "common".

He grew up with a completely different set of shared cultural experiences with others his age, so their common knowledge definition could never be the same as mine or my grandfather's.

By Cageybird — On Nov 18, 2014

I would say that most of the questions on "Jeopardy" qualify as common knowledge trivia for a person with a four year college degree. Just about anyone who attended college that long should have been exposed to the correct answer during at least one class. Whether or not they can remember those facts under the pressure of the lights and cameras and audiences is another matter.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.