We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Convergent Thinking?

Daniel Liden
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Convergent thinking is a style of thought that attempts to consider all available information and arrive at the single best possible answer. Most of the thinking called for in schools is convergent, as schools require students to gather and remember information and make logical decisions and answers accordingly. Convergent thinking is not, generally speaking, particularly creative and is best employed when a single correct answer does exist and can be discovered based on an analysis of available stored information. In contrast to the convergent style of thought is divergent thinking, which is more creative and which often involves multiple possible solutions to problems.

J.P. Guilford first proposed the concepts of divergent and convergent thinking based on his studies of how different people responded to different types of problems. Guilford was an American psychologist that conducted extensive research in the area of human intelligence and problem solving. He observed that most people have a preference for either divergent or convergent thinking, rather than employing an even mix of the two types. Other psychologists have observed that most people show a preference for convergent thinking, as modern schooling pushes students to look for the best possible answers rather than to seek a variety of different, creative answers.

Convergent thinking has a strong emphasis on speed, accuracy, and logic. Arriving at the best, most logical answer in the least time possible is usually the primary objective of the convergent thinker. A convergent thinker usually tries to accumulate knowledge that can be applied in future situations. He will also work to learn strategies and techniques that can be replicated effectively to solve similar types of problems. Previously-acquired information and a logical thought process are essential to the convergent thinker, as he is usually not adept at creatively solving subjective or unfamiliar problem types.

This contrasts directly with divergent thinking, which is more interested in looking at a problem from a variety of angles and discovering several different possible solutions for a problem. Divergent thinking often focuses on drawing information and knowledge from a variety of disciplines and using that knowledge to find several different angles from which to view a problem. Divergent thinkers are often more concerned than convergent thinkers with applying their knowledge to figuring out the world and their place in it. A divergent thinker tends to excel at open-ended problems with a variety of possible solutions, and will tend to be more resourceful, though less inclined toward logic, than a convergent thinker.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Daniel Liden
By Daniel Liden
Daniel Liden, a talented writer with a passion for cutting-edge topics and data analysis, brings a unique perspective to his work. With a diverse academic background, he crafts compelling content on complex subjects, showcasing his ability to effectively communicate intricate ideas. He is skilled at understanding and connecting with target audiences, making him a valuable contributor.
Discussion Comments
By Acracadabra — On May 11, 2011

@CaithnessCC - I agree with you to some extent, but I do think things are changing. Look at companies like Google, a great example of employees who combine both ways of thinking in a 21st century way.

I wouldn't say that this is a fast paced revolution, or even that it is a global one. I just feel comforted by the small changes that are taking place.

By Bakersdozen — On May 09, 2011

My sister is definitely from the divergent learning side of this debate. She struggled endlessly in school, especially with the rules and routines and deadlines which are such a part of that.

I now know that many kids fail in the education system for the same reasons. Luckily she was able to find other outlets and had some home tutor support. She has found her feet teaching critical thinking at a good university, but I know she's one of the few who make it through the system intact.

By CaithnessCC — On May 07, 2011

Although I think both approaches are of equal value it seems society tends to favor one over the other. Take a look at convergent and divergent thinking from the angle of the occupations they tend to be linked with. Doesn't it seem like those which depend on convergent reasoning and validity skills, such as math, science and computing, get more respect?

Daniel Liden
Daniel Liden
Daniel Liden, a talented writer with a passion for cutting-edge topics and data analysis, brings a unique perspective to...
Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.