We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Music Plagiarism?

By Alan Rankin
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Music plagiarism is the use of copyrighted music or lyrics without the consent of the legal copyright holder. Plagiarism is the legal term for copying another person’s or an entity's creative work and passing it off as original material. This generally is considered a violation of ethical standards and might be punishable by law in some areas. In the field of popular music, many legal actions have resulted from claims of music plagiarism. In the late 20th century, the advent of music sampling further complicated the issue.

Like other creative works, music is protected by copyright laws in many countries as well as by the international Berne Convention. Most music is protected for the life of the creator plus several decades. In practice, the copyrights to many popular songs are owned by recording companies, not by the artists themselves. These copyrights can be quite lucrative for years after the song’s initial success. Music companies will therefore vigorously protect these copyrights in instances of music plagiarism, whether real or perceived.

Like other art forms, music is made of many individual elements, and it is often inspired by prior works of art. A simple progression of notes in a song can seem very similar to what is heard in other familiar songs, but this does not necessarily mean that the work has been plagiarized. The judges who oversee music plagiarism cases must weigh these factors when making their decisions. Some claimants are simple opportunists seeking a portion of the fortunes made by successful songs. This only makes it harder to decide those cases where actual plagiarism has taken place.

Music plagiarism cases have taken place since the copyright laws were first written. For example, in 1940, a music publisher claimed that Walt Disney had stolen the tune “Someday My Prince Will Come,” which was used in the film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. The judge later found that this accusation was without merit. In 1971, by contrast, former Beatles musician George Harrison was accused of stealing the tune of “My Sweet Lord” from a 1960s hit record called “He’s So Fine.” A judge found Harrison guilty of “subconscious plagiarism” — that is, he genuinely believed he had originated the tune, but he was liable for damages nonetheless.

In the 1980s and 1990s, rappers and other musicians began “sampling” previously recorded music for their own records. Although these musicians claimed they were creating new works with these samples, recording companies and artists quickly instigated legal action. In 1991, the legal case Grand Upright Music v. Warner Bros set the precedent that sampling was a copyright violation. In 1998, the composers of the hit song “Bitter Sweet Symphony” lost their rights to the music after it was discovered they had sampled a Rolling Stones song without permission. Whether sampling is truly music plagiarism has remained a subject of lively debate.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By Markerrag — On Feb 21, 2014

Music plagiarism is one of the more confusing things to study because there seems to be no clear definition of what is plagiarism and what is not. For example, take the George Harrison case mentioned in the article. It is hard to consider that to be an example of plagiarism when the first two Led Zeppelin albums are full of modified blues standards that the group claimed as its own works.

What is the difference between those two examples? That's hard to say. Throw in a few more examples and the issue becomes more murky. For example, both "Holidays in the Sun" by the Sex Pistols and "In the City" by the Jam share an almost identical main guitar riff. Which one was stolen and which one wasn't? Were both dreamed up independently of each other?

Confusing? You bet.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.