We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Are Shakespeare's History Plays?

Jessica Ellis
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

William Shakespeare, the famous English playwright, wrote plays in many different genres. One area of particular use by Shakespeare was the period of English history leading up to his own day, specifically the Plantagenet and Tudor Dynasties. The history plays cover much of the time period between 1199-1547, and include King John, Richard II, Henry IV, Part IandII, Henry V, Henry VI, Part I, II andIII,Richard III, and Henry VIII.

King John deals with the forced abdication and death of the title character. The brother of Richard the Lionhearted, King John is an incredibly unpopular king and is systematically betrayed by most of the characters, eventually losing the throne. It is historically unknown whether John died of starvation in prison or was murdered, but in this version he is poisoned by a monk. This first of the history plays is probably the least performed in modern times, although it was a favorite play of Victorian era England.

One of the bloodiest of succession battles in the Plantagenet dynasty is the subject of Richard II. The previous monarch, Edward III, passed over his younger sons to bring his grandson Richard II to the throne, leaving Richard to a lifetime battle with his uncles and cousins. Richard II was first performed in 1595 and was considered a politically dangerous play at the time. The current monarch of Shakespeare’s day, Elizabeth I, had come to power through a fight for succession and was considered by some unfit to rule.

The Henry Era of the history plays is probably the best known. Henry IV, Part IandII follow the battles of King Henry IV after his supplanting of Richard II on the throne. Young Hal, son of the king and a lazy drunkard at the beginning, finally renounces his former life and becomes King Henry V. Henry V is a chronicle of the Battle of Agincourt, where a small English army overcame tremendous odds against a French force, and Henry’s victory resulted in his marriage and alliance with France. The life of his son, Henry VI, and the beginning of the War of the Roses is covered by Henry VI, Part I, II and III.

Because of the death of the hero, Richard III is considered by some to be a tragedy. Yet unlike with his other tragedies, Shakespeare paints Richard III as an unredeemable character overrun by flaws and ego. Most experts believe this places Richard III firmly in the camp of the history plays. Richard details the end of the Plantagenet reign and the rise of the Tudor Dynasty. Because Shakespeare’s current monarch was a Tudor, the completely corrupt and villainous character of Richard is often considered political pandering on behalf of the playwright.

The last of the history plays was first performed in 1613, and covers part of the reign of Elizabeth I’s father, Henry VIII. Some scholars speculate that Shakespeare did not attempt to cover this subject until after the death of Elizabeth I, and the succession of a non-Tudor monarch. Henry VIII has never been a popular play, but is notable for a tragic coincidence. At a performance at The Globe Theater in 1613, a cannon misfired, setting the roof of the stage ablaze and destroying the entire theater. Because of this, the play is often considered “cursed” by theater professionals.

Although some of the material of the history plays would have been common knowledge in Shakespeare’s day, he is believed to have taken most of his information from Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland. The history plays are not considered to be completely historically accurate, as Shakespeare left out or added details, characters and motivations. Nevertheless, in a time of little wide-spread education the history plays gave English citizens access to an action-packed version of their own history that remains popular in modern day.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Jessica Ellis
By Jessica Ellis , Writer
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis brings a unique perspective to her work as a writer for Language & Humanities. While passionate about drama and film, Jessica enjoys learning and writing about a wide range of topics, creating content that is both informative and engaging for readers.

Discussion Comments

By anon149293 — On Feb 03, 2011

His plays are very entertaining, and certainly well written, but to say that the histories are "solid" is more than a bit of a stretch. They aren't historic events, they're entertainment loosely based off history.

By Proxy414 — On Dec 24, 2010


Shakespeares works are probably the most solid forms of history we have from that time period. I don't think the curve of political correctness is as strong as you mention.

By ShadowGenius — On Dec 22, 2010

Shakespeare received public praise from Queen Elizabeth, which gained him immortal popularity and immense riches. He painted history in what would have been considered at the time to be "politically correct." It certainly was a politic way of writing which won him such recognition, but his works should not be considered solid history.

By anon77421 — On Apr 14, 2010

Who wrote this article? Your citations?

Jessica Ellis

Jessica Ellis


With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis...
Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.