We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What does "Reinvent the Wheel" Mean?

Tricia Christensen
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The idiom, "reinvent the wheel," is an English saying of unknown origin that is largely used to describe an exercise in futility. Many people will say, “Don’t reinvent the wheel” when they are starting upon a task, meaning that some foundational aspects of the task don’t need to be changed or replicated, as this would be a waste of time. The wheel in this idiom refers to the actual invention of the wheel, and the fact that this invention changed human history, and could be considered a near perfect advancement. The term can stands as symbol for advances in various forms of technology that are thought relatively perfect and don’t require reinvention in order to build something else.

It’s perhaps easier to understand why people wouldn’t want to reinvent the wheel with a concrete example. A computer programmer who is creating a video game may rely on the specific programs already in place to do so. He doesn’t build a game system from the ground up, but instead works to create a game that will fit within an existing system. Provided the goal is just to produce a good video game, the programmer can merely pay attention to existing programming laws and systems to create one.

This example actually includes some of the reasons people have problems with the idiom, reinvent the wheel. Suppose the programmer really wants to create a new and exciting game for a new system. He might very well decide to start by building a new system from the ground up that could allow for greater gaming functionality. Creating the Nintendo Wii®, for example, which allows people to incorporate movement into gaming is a reinvention of the wheel, and arguably a fun and good one. The question becomes what is to be profited when people reinvent existing systems? Sometimes that answer is that there’s much to gain.

Of course, even within this example, not all things are reinvented. The new game system may not reinvent the wheel with basic electronic elements. It may still plug into a wall for instance. Not all aspects have to be newly created in order to change or improve something. Wheels today are still round, but they’re seldom made out of stone, a fact for which anyone wishing to conserve gas can be highly grateful.

A related phrase is “don’t reinvent a square wheel,” which generally means don’t go back to the basics and invent something that isn’t as good as the original. This may reflect a fear that keeps people from branching out and trying new things. Yet sometimes it's necessary to look at the most basic elements of construction in order to see if an accepted design is really as applicable as it could be. Obviously invention has certain come up with some “square wheels,” but it has also developed things the inventors of wheels could never have dreamed possible.

A few people may argue that reinventing the wheel has some purpose. This is why there are many classes in engineering and physics and at high school and grammar school levels where students rebuild very simple machines. Actually working on these machines may give people an appreciation for the thought and skill it took to create something. It offers hands on experience instead of asking students to take for granted the massive achievements of even small and basic creations.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a Language & Humanities contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.
Discussion Comments
By Ruggercat68 — On Feb 15, 2014

I think there are some basic technologies that don't need to be reinvented, like the wheel, but others could still be re-examined, at least. I think of the incandescent light bulb. It was certainly a major improvement over candles or gas lamps, but 100+ years later, it's viewed as inefficient. Too much of its energy is transmitted as heat, not light. Reinventing the light bulb wouldn't be such a bad idea.

Simple machines like wheels and levers and drills are never going to fall out of favor, but that doesn't mean future inventors won't find ways to make them work better. The wheel was a great invention, but so was the greased axle.

Tricia Christensen
Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a Language & Humanities contributor,...
Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.