We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a Hypothetical Question?

By Alan Rankin
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A hypothetical question is one that deals with events that might possibly happen, rather than what has or has not actually happened. To narrow down the number of possible answers, the questioner usually sets up imaginary parameters, such as “What would happen if the sun went out?” This is often described as a hypothetical situation. A person who asks a hypothetical question may be seeking, or claim to be seeking, an impartial answer. The usual objective is to imagine the most likely scenario or scenarios that might occur in a given hypothetical situation.

Hypothetical questions are frequently used in public rhetoric and communications, as well as in everyday conversation. They should not be confused with rhetorical questions, which are questions that have no expected answer. Hypothetical questions are expected to be answered, but the answer has no bearing on actual events, at least in theory. In casual conversation, the person who asks a hypothetical question may actually be trying to figure out the likely outcome for an action that he or she is considering. In public discourse, speakers may likewise have ulterior motives for employing hypothetical questions.

Scientific studies have shown that certain kinds of hypothetical questions can influence the person who hears them, whether the questioner intends it or not. For example, the question “How likely are you to vote for Candidate X?” tends to subtly cast Candidate X in a positive light, especially when asked by the candidate’s pollsters. A more neutral question might be “Which candidate are you likely to vote for?” The questions in public opinion and scientific surveys, in which accuracy is paramount, are worded to emphasize neutrality. In advertising and public relations, which are intended to sway and persuade the public, questions may be worded deliberately to further these ends.

“Hypothetical question” is also a legal term in the justice systems of the U.S. and other countries. This usually refers to a question posed by an attorney in witness testimony. In general, questions should be confined to the evidence and testimony particular to the case, and hypothetical questions may result in a legal objection. In some instances, however, a hypothetical question may be relevant. An expert witness, for example, can describe the likelihood of a hypothetical situation occurring, as long as it falls entirely within the field of his or her expertise.

Science, particularly theoretical physics, also depends upon hypothetical questions and situations. These are sometimes called “thought experiments.” Instead of describing situations that have not occurred, they describe situations that science does not yet fully understand. By applying all the known facts and speculating about the results, scientists can actually achieve insights and advance knowledge through these thought experiments. This practice is particularly useful for scientific fields in which observation and experiment are impractical or impossible, such as quantum mechanics or astrophysics.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By RoyalSpyder — On Aug 29, 2014

Overall, I feel like hypothetical questions are best reserved for court cases. For the most part, it gives you time to reflect on your actions, whether you're guilty or innocent. For example, if someone has been convicted of murder, the judge could ask them if they would have done anything differently, if they knew the outcome. While it's too late to go back and fix the problem, it's a good way to bring closure to the case.

By Viranty — On Aug 28, 2014

Does it annoy anyone else when you ask a hypothetical question, and yet some people won't acknowledge that, and take it as a real question? However, in some cases, it may be because one party is only asking the hypothetical question because they known they've done something wrong, and they're trying to cover up for it.

For example, let's say a five year old broke a lamp when his father wasn't home. Later on, if the kid were to ask if he'd get punished for breaking a lamp, the father has every right to jump to a conclusion, since it's very obvious that the kid is trying to cover his tracks. Although this isn't always the case, from rhetorical questions to hypothetical ones, they can lead to some very interesting analyses.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.