We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Non-Sequitur?

Michael Pollick
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The word non-sequitur is derived from a Latin phrase meaning "it does not follow." There are two different connotations of this term: one can be found in the philosophical world of logic, while the other is a literary device based on an illogical premise. Some legal arguments presented in court rely on a logical non-sequitur, while a number of comedies and jokes depend on the illogical for success.

In the sense of pure logic, a non-sequitur begins with the presentation of two or more statements called premises. Premise A could be "God is love." Premise B could be "Love is blind." Premise C states "Ray Charles is blind." The non-sequitur conclusion based on these premises would be "Therefore, Ray Charles is God."

Each of the premises could be considered true, at least philosophically, but the outcome doesn't work. When the conclusion is not supported logically by the preceding premises, it is said to be a non-sequitur, even if it is true.

Both the prosecution and the defense in a court case may use this form of non-sequitur logic to guide a jury towards a specific conclusion. The prosecutor may argue that the crime took place in an architectural firm. The defendant is an architect at that firm. Therefore, the defendant must have committed the crime.

The conclusion that the defendant committed the crime would be a logical non-sequitur. In reality, the location of the crime scene may be irrelevant, and the defendant is not necessarily the only architect working for the firm. The defense attorney could argue that the prosecution's argument is invalid based on this conclusion.

In a literary sense, a non-sequitur can be any unexpected response to a set of predictable circumstances. It could also be a deliberately illogical response offered for comedic effect. The British comedy troupe Monty Python often uses non-sequiturs to bring their sketches to an abrupt end.

Characters in absurdest plays may hold entire conversations consisting of one non-sequitur line after another: "I made pancakes this morning." "Oh, do you think it might rain?" "Only if a dingo ate my baby." "Ran out of wallpaper paste again, eh?" The humor lies in the complete unpredictability that this form provides.

Many jokes also rely on a non-sequitur ending, although the audience may have to abandon all hopes of linear thought to understand them. A non-sequitur works best when it does not follow the predicted course of the script at all. The statement does not have to be completely absurd in order to be funny, but it does have to go against the audience's expectations. Two gangsters involved in a tense stand-off could suddenly decide to run away and get married, for example. This would be an effective use of non-sequitur, since the audience would have expected a cliched ending, such as the police breaking down the door. Comedy sketch shows use this type of endings quite often, especially when a more logical ending would not be possible.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Pollick
By Michael Pollick , Writer
As a frequent contributor to Language & Humanities, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a wide range of topics. His curiosity drives him to study subjects in-depth, resulting in informative and engaging articles. Prior to becoming a professional writer, Michael honed his skills as an English tutor, poet, voice-over artist, and DJ.

Discussion Comments

Michael Pollick

Michael Pollick


As a frequent contributor to Language & Humanities, Michael Pollick uses his passion for research and writing to cover a...
Learn more
Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.