We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who is Bhagavan?

By Brendan McGuigan
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Language & Humanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Language & Humanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Bhagavan is a fairly complex term used in Hinduism, and by extension used in both Buddhism and Jainism as well. At its most basic, Bhagavan can be understood to represent a personal Supreme Being. Bhagavan is perhaps the manifestation of the divine in Hinduism that is closest to the Judeo-Christian understanding of a God.

While Brahman can also be thought of as representing a Supreme Being, it is generally used as a term to denote a more spiritual and abstract understanding of that being. Bhagavan, in contrast, is given a personality, with desires and defining characteristics. One way to think about the distinction between Brahman and Bhagavan would be to compare it to certain Christian views of God the Holy Ghost and God the Father, with the former being associated more with a general lifeforce, and the latter having a personality as Creator.

Bhagavan is also used as a title for many figures in Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism. In this context it can be understood simply as Lord, comparing the figure so named to the God-head of Bhagavan Himself. Female figures or goddesses may bear the same title in the feminine form, Bhagawati.

The title appears in Buddhism as a descriptor for the Buddha back to the early Pali Buddhist documents. This is most often translated simply as Lord Buddha or Lord Shakyamuni, where the original would be something like sakamunisa bhagavato. In Hinduism a number of the major gods are given the title Bhagavan, such as Bhagavan Shiva, Bhagavan Swaminarayan, Bhagavan Krishna, and Bhagawati Durga. In many English texts these would simply appear as Lord Krishna or the like.

In Hinduism the term Svayam Bhagavan may be used to differentiate the God-head from other gods who might bear the title of Lord. This can be translated roughly as meaning The Lord Himself, and may refer to Krishna in sects of Hinduism in which Krishna is viewed as the source of all divinity, or to Vishnu or Narayana in sects in which one of these figures is viewed as the ultimate source of the gods. In some sects, Svayam Bhagavan may even refer to a certain manifestation of Krishna, which can be understood as the god from which all the gods of our world spring, but who is subordinate to the triumvirate power of Vishnu, Brahma, and Shiva, who in turn are subordinate to Krishna’s form as ultimate God-head, or Svayam Rupa.

In the modern world, it is not uncommon to hear Bhagavan applied as a title to gurus and babas, as well as to the deities. This stems from the idea that God permeates all things of this world, and serves as a mark of respect for the ultimate teachers, acknowledging how visible the God-head has become in them. There are two recent and famous gurus who have borne this title. One is Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, also known as Osho, a religious leader who died in 1990, and practiced an openly sexual form of Hinduism, propagating a movement known as neo-sannyas. The other is Bhagavan Das, a Yogi from California best known for helping to guide Ram Dass to a guru in his early spiritual awakening.

Language & Humanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By serenesurface — On Mar 09, 2011

One of my friends had started following the teachings of a "spiritual avatar" several years ago who goes by the name "Bhagavan." "Oneness Movement" is the name of the movement that this spiritual leader and his assistants have started. The movement claims to enlighten those who follow their teachings and requires his followers to pay high amounts of money to enlist in his courses and trainings in order to reach enlightenment. My friend thankfully realized the potential problems of this movement and backed out in time. But there are many devotees of the movement who dutifully follow everything the founders instruct. I have deep respect for everyone's beliefs and methods for spiritual contentment. But I do believe that many of these religious leaders are using religion and people's spiritual needs for their own benefit and monetary gain. I just think that we need to be careful. I personally believe that we should refer only to God as Bhagavan and not use it a as a title for regular people.

By SteamLouis — On Mar 08, 2011

My experience with the term Bhagavan in Hindi conversation is that it is used the same way that English speakers use the word "God." For example, when someone is surprised, upset, annoyed, appalled and is trying to emphasize their reaction, they often say "Bhagavan!" just as we say "God!" This is how I understood the term anyway. I agree that it gives the impression of talking about a single supreme being rather than the many gods mentioned in Hinduism.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Language & Humanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.